<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: VMware introduces View Composer: EMC not happy?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://virtualfuture.info/2008/12/vmware-introduces-view-composer-emc-not-happy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://virtualfuture.info/2008/12/vmware-introduces-view-composer-emc-not-happy/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 18:36:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan</title>
		<link>http://virtualfuture.info/2008/12/vmware-introduces-view-composer-emc-not-happy/comment-page-1/#comment-620</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 21:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtualfuture.info/?p=588#comment-620</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think it&#039;s a problem. EMC will start leveraging vStorage technologies as soon as it&#039;s available and a better integration will be the result.

How cool would it be if ESX could do a SAN based copy instead of a normal file copy or use SAN technologies for thin provisioning. Or what about load balancing.

I don&#039;t think EMC minds VMware moving forward.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s a problem. EMC will start leveraging vStorage technologies as soon as it&#8217;s available and a better integration will be the result.</p>
<p>How cool would it be if ESX could do a SAN based copy instead of a normal file copy or use SAN technologies for thin provisioning. Or what about load balancing.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think EMC minds VMware moving forward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

